Money Madness

The poem can be best described as:

The speaker's use of the word "madness" to describe society's relationship with money suggests:

The root cause of the speaker's fear is:

The consequence of having no money, according to the speaker, is:

The speaker’s concern about people killing each other over money highlights:

The speaker warns that the alternative to regaining sanity about money is:

The speaker's desired scope for these free necessities is:

The speaker's solution to the "money-madness" is:

The speaker suggests that individuals:

The speaker believes money is:

The phrase "collective money-madness" implies that the problem is:

The speaker believes money is necessary:

The speaker's ultimate goal regarding money is:

The speaker's tone can be described as:

The speaker's fear can escalate into:

The speaker’s vision of “bread should be free” implies a belief in:

The speaker's tone throughout the passage is primarily:

The speaker believes that the fear of not having money is:

The speaker's repetition of "eat dirt" emphasizes:

The speaker's reaction to handling money is:

The speaker’s use of “we” and “us” suggests:

The speaker's fear is primarily about:

The speaker's fear of "eating dirt" symbolizes:

Mankind, according to the speaker, judges a person by:

The speaker's concern about money is primarily related to:

The speaker warns that the alternative to regaining sanity about money is:

The speaker's vision for a better world includes:

The basic necessities the speaker mentions are:

The speaker uses the word "grovel" to describe how people behave before money, suggesting

The central idea of the poem is:

The phrase "one thing or the other" signifies: